| 1 |
rob holland wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> --On Monday, July 14, 2003 12:25:16 +0300 Tal Peer <coredumb@g.o> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> While discussing the state of the php-cvs package on #gentoo_dev, lu_zero |
| 7 |
>> suggested that we open a new category 'app-cvs' and move all -cvs |
| 8 |
>> packages there. That way we don't litter all the categories with -cvs |
| 9 |
>> ebuilds that most of users don't need/want. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I don't think this is a good idea. It defeats the purpose of the |
| 13 |
> categories. Why would we do this when we don't do app-ftp for all apps |
| 14 |
> which have an ftp url in the SRC_URI? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Regards, |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Rob |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> robh@g.o / robh:irc.freenode.net |
| 23 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~robh/robh@g.o.a |
| 24 |
> sc |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Another good name is apps-in-itinere or half-done, if that gives you a |
| 27 |
better picture of what is the idea of that new cat. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Luca Barbato |
| 33 |
Developer |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives