Archives
Archives
| From: | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2016 07:31:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 58047E2D.4010505@iee.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 17/10/16 08:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > But seriously, what has become of the package tags proposal? It seems |
| 4 | > to me that it would fit some of the things suggested previously in |
| 5 | > this thread. |
| 6 | > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Antarus/Package_Tags |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Ulrich |
| 9 | Looks rational to me .. blockers? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |