Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Closing bugs [was: New Bugzilla HOWTO]
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 03:43:42
Message-Id: 42CF48A3.2080905@ieee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Closing bugs [was: New Bugzilla HOWTO] by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 >>>This brings up a point that really irks me. In the bug, I believe the dev
6 >>>implies that the reported bug has merit /yet he closes the bug before
7 >>>actually doing something about it/. And I don't mean to pick on Jeffrey;
8 >>>this seems to be a common habit among Gentoo devs.
9 >
10 >
11 > that's because we got tired of asking for more info/whatever and never getting
12 > anything back ... so we close the bug, get it off our 'todo' lists, and wait
13 > for the user to get back to us (not all do)
14 >
15 > this is the biggest reason NEEDINFO was created
16
17 Having the reporter be the verifier is a great idea (probably ideal),
18 but again, you could assign the verification to the Team Lead. If the
19 Team Lead can get the user to respond, great, otherwise they could do
20 the QA themselves.
21
22 >>Also note that the bug is NOT "closed", only /resolved/. There /is/ a
23 >>not insignificant technical difference, altho it /does/ seem Gentoo
24 >>doesn't seem to actually close bugs that often.
25
26 Ah, my bad. For some reason I thought it had been closed. But I know
27 that if you looked (not too hard) you could find bugs that were closed
28 by the person assigned to resolve it and/or that were closed before the
29 'fix' was marked stable.
30
31 >
32 > thats because very few (if any) think or care about the difference
33
34 You could make bugzilla try to enforce the process; that would get dev's
35 thinking and caring! Just think: The Great QA Rebellion of 2005 ;)
36
37 Anyway, this stuff is important to me 1) because I do systems
38 integration for a living and deal with this sort of stuff daily 2) good
39 QA is an 'enterprise characteristic' if you will, and 3) good QA
40 benefits everyone (although it annoys some developers to no end).
41
42 Nathan
43
44
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
47 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
48
49 iD8DBQFCz0ij2QTTR4CNEQARAitWAKCXfs0tTNRo3eOPvuZ+VJYUG13GKACgkalh
50 7eRv7Aj61BNfMnFSN/I76oI=
51 =N7XG
52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
53 --
54 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies