| 1 |
On 3/23/06, Daniel Ostrow <dostrow@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> You can't have it both ways, either they are wholey Unofficial and do not get |
| 3 |
> tracked in bugzilla at all (something which would have to be made VERY clear |
| 4 |
> to our users, e.g. a you use it you get to keep the pieces policy, and the |
| 5 |
> developer or team in question is the *only* point of contact for fixing |
| 6 |
> things) -or- it is an Official overlay with official support which means it |
| 7 |
> needs to abide by the rules... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think we need both: An aggregation of unofficial and clearly stated |
| 10 |
unofficial overlays which are currently in place. |
| 11 |
And an official gentoo user and developer overlay, where ebuilds have |
| 12 |
to conform to policy. |
| 13 |
The difference between official and unofficial: bugs can be on |
| 14 |
bugs.gentoo.org or not. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Then both goals would be met: Access to a gentoo-overlay for |
| 17 |
non-developers and an aggregation of all gentoo overlays out there. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- Stefan |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives