| 1 |
On 2020-07-29 15:46, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yes, net-nntp/sabnzbd is valid as it still has an ebuild with only |
| 3 |
> py2.7. So fix it instead of bitching and being lazy about it. You |
| 4 |
> could have done that vice revert the commit. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
What are you talking about?! |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
When upstream released first version supporting Py3, it was added to |
| 9 |
repository. So don't call me lazy! |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Like you can see, it's currently in RC state. No cleanup of previous |
| 12 |
stable version will happen before this version was declared stable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So no, your list was wrong. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> I will revert your revert when I return to my laptop. Thanks for |
| 18 |
> nothing. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
...and not just because of net-nntp/sabnzbd like this thread has shown. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I followed Gentoo policy when I reverted a broken commit. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
If can only urge you to revise pkg list and pay more attention for your |
| 25 |
next commit. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 31 |
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |
Archives