Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 21:29:25
Message-Id: 20171203212915.GA14411@linux1.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists by Dirkjan Ochtman
1 On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:30:36PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
2 > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3 >
4 > > 1. Posting to gentoo-dev@ and gentoo-project@ mailing lists will be
5 > > initially restricted to active Gentoo developers.
6 > >
7 > > 1a. Subscription (reading) and archives will still be open.
8 > >
9 > > 1b. Active Gentoo contributors will be able to obtain posting access
10 > > upon being vouched for by an active Gentoo developer.
11 > >
12 >
13 > On the face of it, I like this proposal. On the other hand, wouldn't it be
14 > better if we just had more active list moderators? That is, moderators who
15 > move problematic user's posts to moderated by default, and then withhold
16 > the specific posts if necessary?
17
18 I prefer this approach, I'm not in favor of closing -dev and -project.
19 However, I don't see anything wrong with putting specific users on
20 moderation for a while as long as the mailing list software we have can
21 support doing this.
22
23 >
24 > 2. A new mailing list 'gentoo-expert' will be formed to provide
25 > > a discussion medium for expert Gentoo users and developers.
26 > >
27 > > 2a. gentoo-expert will have open posting access like gentoo-dev has now.
28 > >
29 >
30 > I'm not sure this will be worth it. Who exactly do you think is the
31 > audience for this mailing list? What is the goal? How is it different from
32 > existing mailing lists?
33
34 In particular, how is it different from gentoo-user? There's nothing
35 stopping devs from subscribing there.
36
37 Thanks,
38
39 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature