From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] DESCRIPTION="Based on the ${ECLASS} eclass" | ||
Date: | Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:24:45 | ||
Message-Id: | CAJaTeTqTjm2DRTxn6CX+PomUuu2FNE08LOrGaF94+OmyOVnEGg@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] DESCRIPTION="Based on the ${ECLASS} eclass" by "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" |
1 | On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
2 | > I have a personal vendetta on this subject. Several eclasses set a |
3 | > completely worthless description (and even more set a mostly worthless |
4 | > DESCRIPTION) which ends up contaminating the DESCRIPTION for an ebuild |
5 | > when inherit is done after DESCRIPTION is set. |
6 | |
7 | looks like you've already triaged the bug. fix the ebuilds. |
8 | -mike |