| 1 |
* Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
<snip> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> > Yes, would be better, if it's included in the gpm release. |
| 6 |
> > But: it should be possible to build/install it independently from |
| 7 |
> > gpm, and also to build gpm against an already installed libgpm. |
| 8 |
> > So actually two separate packages, maybe distributed in one tarball. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> considering gpm uses autotools, i really dont see why there needs |
| 11 |
> to be all that many changes ... write it correctly and it'd be |
| 12 |
> easy to fold into configure.ac/Makefile.am |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> ./configure --disable-binaries |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That doesn't seem to be clean enough for me. I need the libgpm, |
| 17 |
and only libgpm, built, and then gpm server built against this |
| 18 |
(already installed) libgpm, found via pkg-config. I've got very |
| 19 |
strict policies at this point. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
My further plan in short words: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+ further tests on libgpm |
| 24 |
+ split off the gpm server and rewrite to build against an already |
| 25 |
installed libgpm (found via pkg-config) |
| 26 |
+ put both into some cumulative package, which can be build |
| 27 |
just as the current gpm package. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Meanwhile we also should try to get in the pkg-config stuff, |
| 30 |
and let several parts to be switched off as you suggested, |
| 31 |
optionally build the server against an installed libgpm, etc. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
cu |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 37 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ |
| 40 |
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact@×××××.de |
| 41 |
cellphone: +49 174 7066481 |
| 42 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives