1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
Daniel Drake wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
>Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: |
9 |
> |
10 |
>>That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let |
11 |
>>the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done |
12 |
>>up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think |
13 |
>>$FOO is stupid" wasn't a valid closure code in bugzilla ;-) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
>Then you have different views from the kernel project :) |
17 |
> |
18 |
>We and try and make our kernel (gentoo-sources) _more_ stable than the |
19 |
>official Linux releases. We mainly stick to bug fixes decreed worthy by the |
20 |
>upstream developers, etc. We never include patches when we know of problems |
21 |
>that they will introduce. |
22 |
> |
23 |
>Daniel |
24 |
|
25 |
i know this has been said before many many times, but i really can't |
26 |
wait until i can see reiserfs4 in a "stable" kernel (vanilla or |
27 |
gentoo) but i doubt that the gentoo-sources crew is going to budge |
28 |
[whining]please.. USE flag'd reiser4? please pretty please[/whinning] |
29 |
|
30 |
Anyways, I can understand the hesitence for the kernel project to add |
31 |
things that have so many possibilties of problems like reiserfs4.. |
32 |
|
33 |
But for me its stable enough that I've only had to run reiserfsck |
34 |
once, and that was right after i set it up, and i had a powerloss.. i |
35 |
ended up just mkreiser4'ing and starting over because it was before i |
36 |
even unpacked a stage.. |
37 |
|
38 |
Anyways, Sorry that this wasnt in gentoo-user, |
39 |
Regards, Andrew |
40 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
41 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
42 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
43 |
|
44 |
iD8DBQFCtIhAphOMdPLugR4RApBEAKDTV1G40VuPiP5OfVdc0YbezIZF8QCgn/sF |
45 |
e9s+42bIyQ0e+J/4UXchN20= |
46 |
=pqyn |
47 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |