| 1 |
On Чтв, 2006-06-08 at 21:20 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 2 |
> It's not a "normal" overlay as I see it. You've promoted it to be an |
| 3 |
> official overlay. The difference is huge in my opinion. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
IMO such overlay should be official! Why not to keep all (partially) |
| 6 |
broken ebuilds in one place? This is the same story as with German |
| 7 |
gentoo forum that is outside gentoo.org and thus none of devs wanted to |
| 8 |
keep eyes there, so forum became much less useful. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Another problem with BMG is that it is gnome oriented, as cleary stated |
| 11 |
on About page and thus I never thought that my, fex, www-apps could be |
| 12 |
there. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > As already mentioned at 1), it is an overlay. The devs on sunrise do |
| 15 |
> > keep an eye on it and all ebuilds do have to pass at least repoman and |
| 16 |
> > some basic QA checks (currently done when porting them from bugs.g.o) so |
| 17 |
> > that they don't do some rm -rf / thing. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Will you also review the code each and every ebuild pull down over the |
| 20 |
> internet? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
And that is really exciting moment. :) The main difference between such |
| 23 |
overlay and wiki is that reading text never does `rm -rf /`. How can one |
| 24 |
stop such jokes? I think if this problem will be solved such overlay |
| 25 |
should be. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Peter. |
Archives