| 1 |
В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 16:59 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:13:34 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > [proposal] |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> I know it's not directly related to stabilization, but lately people |
| 7 |
> have been removing the only keyworded package for the mips arch, under |
| 8 |
> the excuse that's it's been over 30 days since they opened a keywording |
| 9 |
> bug. This has been happening on bugs where there are technical issues |
| 10 |
> and on bugs where we just haven't replied (in which case i can see the |
| 11 |
> justification). I don't think this is acceptable, just as I don't |
| 12 |
> think removing the only stable version of a package on an arch is |
| 13 |
> be acceptable, barring the circumstances Mark outlined above. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That people should revert back that ebuilds then. Of course it's not |
| 16 |
acceptable to remove keywords just because of one's wishes. As it was |
| 17 |
told in this thread old ebuilds are not maintainer's concern and he/she |
| 18 |
could touch them only after all arch teams finish their work. Until they |
| 19 |
done all bugs in old ebuilds should be assigned on arch teams. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Peter. |
Archives