1 |
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:09:55 +0200 |
2 |
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Markos Chandras |
5 |
> <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > I propose the following arches to lose their stable keywords |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > - s390 |
9 |
> > - sh |
10 |
> > - ia64 |
11 |
> > - alpha |
12 |
> > - m68k |
13 |
> > - sparc |
14 |
> |
15 |
> +many. |
16 |
|
17 |
++many. |
18 |
|
19 |
If any of these arches considers themselves to be a major arch; they |
20 |
need to speak up and let us know if reasonable, but then we also need |
21 |
to ensure that we draw more manpower to such major arch. |
22 |
|
23 |
There's maybe one or so important in the server world; but as I don't |
24 |
have a good enough clue about that, I'm not going to name any names. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
With kind regards, |
28 |
|
29 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
30 |
Gentoo Developer |
31 |
|
32 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
33 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
34 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |