| 1 |
But they don't. See my two blog posts on the matter. ABI compatibility is |
| 2 |
explicitly not. What they care about. |
| 3 |
On 23 Jan 2015 05:56, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Dnia 2015-01-23, o godz. 01:51:24 |
| 6 |
> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Regarding the last libav discussion I think we should also go with a |
| 9 |
> > "libressl" USE flag instead of creating a virtual that makes handling |
| 10 |
> > SUBSLOTs impossible. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If libressl and openssl would have matching ABIs, that wouldn't be |
| 13 |
> necessary and you could what virtual/libudev does, i.e. explicit |
| 14 |
> subslot deps. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> -- |
| 17 |
> Best regards, |
| 18 |
> Michał Górny |
| 19 |
> |
Archives