From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl | ||
Date: | Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:56:31 | ||
Message-Id: | 20150123065607.74cd64d1@pomiot.lan | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl by hasufell |
1 | Dnia 2015-01-23, o godz. 01:51:24 |
2 | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 | |
4 | > Regarding the last libav discussion I think we should also go with a |
5 | > "libressl" USE flag instead of creating a virtual that makes handling |
6 | > SUBSLOTs impossible. |
7 | |
8 | If libressl and openssl would have matching ABIs, that wouldn't be |
9 | necessary and you could what virtual/libudev does, i.e. explicit |
10 | subslot deps. |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Best regards, |
14 | Michał Górny |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |