Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:10:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200509140004.58256.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC by Jon Portnoy |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 13 September 2005 11:10 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 | > As far as devrel goes, call me a traditionalist but I think while infra |
| 3 | > should be able to do emergency deactivations (and afaik nobody's ever |
| 4 | > said they shouldn't) devrel should continue to be responsible for |
| 5 | > disciplinary issues including repeated QA violations reported by the QA |
| 6 | > team |
| 7 | |
| 8 | works for me ... best to keep the number of 'bad guys' down to a min :D |
| 9 | -mike |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC | Thierry Carrez <koon@g.o> |