| 1 |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:21:42PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 6 |
> > if you read this whole thread you'll find that it is a grey area with |
| 7 |
> > different devrel people saying/thinking different things in terms of what |
| 8 |
> > devrel's responsibilities are |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It sounds like somebody needs to take a look at all of the existing |
| 11 |
> documentation for this topic, write a GLEP that clarifies the matter, |
| 12 |
> and present it to the council for a vote. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> - - who should enforce Gentoo policy (technical or otherwise)? |
| 15 |
> - - what are the procedures for getting the enforcement done? |
| 16 |
> - - what checks and balances are in place (and are more/clarification |
| 17 |
> needed)? |
| 18 |
> - - etc. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sounds to me more like people who aren't familiar with the internal |
| 22 |
structure of Gentoo don't need to be the peanut gallery when it comes to |
| 23 |
internal structural issues, but that's just me 8) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
As far as devrel goes, call me a traditionalist but I think while infra |
| 26 |
should be able to do emergency deactivations (and afaik nobody's ever |
| 27 |
said they shouldn't) devrel should continue to be responsible for |
| 28 |
disciplinary issues including repeated QA violations reported by the QA |
| 29 |
team |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 33 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives