Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:16:35
Message-Id: 43278936.50909@ieee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 > if you read this whole thread you'll find that it is a grey area with
6 > different devrel people saying/thinking different things in terms of what
7 > devrel's responsibilities are
8
9 It sounds like somebody needs to take a look at all of the existing
10 documentation for this topic, write a GLEP that clarifies the matter,
11 and present it to the council for a vote.
12
13 - - who should enforce Gentoo policy (technical or otherwise)?
14 - - what are the procedures for getting the enforcement done?
15 - - what checks and balances are in place (and are more/clarification
16 needed)?
17 - - etc.
18
19 Nathan
20
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
23
24 iD8DBQFDJ4k22QTTR4CNEQARAvbbAJwNtqXM9L9ycyCqmQoJrelYeNnE0wCgoRit
25 4mUsp/yONu4TfTAV5GVxSKk=
26 =Mflu
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies