Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: MAL <mal@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: Terje Kvernes <terjekv@××××××××.no>, carpaski@××××××.net
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:42:03
Message-Id: 3E54AEAF.5050203@komcept.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing by MAL
1 MAL wrote:
2 > Terje Kvernes wrote:
3 >
4 >> the same thing happens here. reverting to portage 2.0.46-whatever
5 >> fixed the problem. this also made forkbombs on my box, since even
6 >> restarting X uses the GCC preprocessor, which didn't quite do it's
7 >> thing. this is, for the record, a 1.2-based system. I'll submit to
8 >> bugzilla eventually, when it's not 4am. :-)
9 >
10 > For the record, i'm on a was-1.2 system that I upgraded to 1.4 with the
11 > update scripts and info here:
12 > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/upgrade-to-gentoo-1.4.xml
13 >
14 > A good chunk of my system is probably still linked against the old
15 > libraries, as I emerged the compat libs instead of doing an emerge -e
16 > world.
17
18 Sorry about replying to my own post, but for the record, downgrading
19 portage to 2.0.46-r12 allowed me to emerge gcc-config successfully and
20 then emerge xpm fine.
21
22 Please could someone explain why this happened? Don't want to be stuck
23 on a version of portage forever :/
24
25 Cheers,
26 MAL
27
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing Terje Kvernes <terjekv@××××××××.no>