| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 07/26/2012 12:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Indeed, and this opens another can of worms since (as far as I can see) there |
| 5 |
>> are no specific license clauses in the AAC patent license for applications |
| 6 |
>> that may be distributed without cost. I.e., licensing fees still apply as "per |
| 7 |
>> unit fee". |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Tell me where I should categorize it =) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I believe that I can go to BINARY-REDISTRIBUTABLE. But please check if |
| 12 |
the following rules apply here: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# - MAY require explicit inclusion of the license with |
| 15 |
# the distribution [1] |
| 16 |
# - IFF there is an explicit inclusion requirement, USE=bindist |
| 17 |
# MUST cause a copy of the license to be installed in a file |
| 18 |
# location compliant with the license, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Ulrich |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
[1] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6c950b46c50fe72ebc5e650bbf70f77c.xml> |
Archives