1 |
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:33:59 -0400 |
2 |
Sylvain Alain <d2racing911@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> The KDE team seems to work on that too : |
5 |
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134052539215508&w=2 |
6 |
|
7 |
it's actually worth it. |
8 |
more user-spread FUD or however you like to call it on the topic than |
9 |
I'm not sure if *devs* are actually working on that. I believe there's |
10 |
|
11 |
> Now I understand why some devs are working hard to make Mdev working |
12 |
> with OpenRC. |
13 |
|
14 |
different, you could as well disable USE=udev and use regular udev. |
15 |
equivalent to KDE/GNOME/whatever without anything? And if it's no |
16 |
But you are aware that KDE/GNOME/whatever+mdev would be practically |
17 |
|
18 |
> They want to replace Udev/SystemD with Mdev/OpenRC and solve this |
19 |
> situation. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Sylvain aka d2_racing |
22 |
> |
23 |
> 2012/8/7 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
26 |
> > > Yes, but if the upstream that is Gnome decides to start depending |
27 |
> > > on systemd features then that's their decision, and the place to |
28 |
> > > discuss if it's good or bad (more important, the place to change |
29 |
> > > it!) would be within the Gnome project. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > More or less, but again my goal was not to start another discussion |
32 |
> > - just to inform. Anybody inclined to comment on whether this is |
33 |
> > good or bad should go look at the list archives and see if any of |
34 |
> > the 400 messages in the last month already covered their points. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > > |
37 |
> > > I guess Gentoo will always continue to offer the best of upstream. |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > I don't think Gentoo has to limit itself to what upstream supports |
40 |
> > (I don't think anybody would look at Prefix and say that this was |
41 |
> > what any upstream had in mind). However, the bottom line is that |
42 |
> > to do something exotic takes effort, so nothing will happen unless |
43 |
> > somebody makes it happen. |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> > > |
46 |
> > > OTOH, if upstream goes and make some change that means a |
47 |
> > > regression for Gentoo users, then they deserve bug report floods |
48 |
> > > from their users! |
49 |
> > :) |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > Perhaps, but don't count on it going anywhere. With Gnome 3 they |
52 |
> > must already have pretty thick skin. I suspect upstream would say |
53 |
> > that if you want a smooth desktop experience you shouldn't be |
54 |
> > running Gentoo. To some degree they probably even have a valid |
55 |
> > point. Gentoo is about more than a just-works desktop so I think |
56 |
> > the best we'll be able to offer is a "reasonable" experience. If |
57 |
> > things get really integrated you might see some Sabayon-like forks |
58 |
> > favoring particular DEs/etc, and as long as those forks contribute |
59 |
> > to our main tree I think that is good for all of us. |
60 |
> > |
61 |
> > Rich |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > |
64 |
> |
65 |
> |
66 |
|
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
-- |
70 |
Best regards, |
71 |
Michał Górny |