| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:33:59 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Sylvain Alain <d2racing911@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> The KDE team seems to work on that too : |
| 6 |
>> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134052539215508&w=2 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> it's actually worth it. |
| 9 |
> more user-spread FUD or however you like to call it on the topic than |
| 10 |
> I'm not sure if *devs* are actually working on that. I believe there's |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Perhaps not official Gentoo devs, but users taking development |
| 13 |
initiative to solve a problem in userland. I'm not an official Gentoo |
| 14 |
dev, either, but I think it'd be a very bad idea to discourage or |
| 15 |
ridicule such initiative. Someone putting in that much effort in light |
| 16 |
of all the information already available isn't something that should |
| 17 |
be taken lightly! |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>> Now I understand why some devs are working hard to make Mdev working |
| 21 |
>> with OpenRC. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> different, you could as well disable USE=udev and use regular udev. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> equivalent to KDE/GNOME/whatever without anything? And if it's no |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> But you are aware that KDE/GNOME/whatever+mdev would be practically |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
(My reason for replying...looks like a few chunks of text got lost here.) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
[snip] |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
:wq |
Archives