| 1 |
В Срд, 01/06/2011 в 19:37 -0400, Matt Turner пишет: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 3 |
> <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > To be clear I support the goal to move our tree to git. |
| 5 |
> > However, I'd like to point out that simply moving to git will leave us |
| 6 |
> > in the same state. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
++ |
| 9 |
ChangeLog files are text to be distributed to our users so they are |
| 10 |
completely independent of vcs we use. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> > Assuming everyone agrees that git is far more useful |
| 13 |
> > than cvs to check for changes in the tree, a simple but important issue |
| 14 |
> > remains: the plan is to move the "development tree" to git, but to keep |
| 15 |
> > the rsync mirrors for users. So the "move to git" doesn't fix the issue |
| 16 |
> > for users or developers using an rsync tree. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Temporarily or permanently? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> One of the huge benefits in using git would be really fast emerge |
| 21 |
> --syncs. Not having some kind of system for migrating users to git |
| 22 |
> seems like a lot of the benefits are lost. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Is git faster then rsync? I've never done any checks but it'll be |
| 25 |
surprising if it will. Another useful feature of rsync is --exclude that |
| 26 |
allows some categories to be excluded (for size and speed efficiency), |
| 27 |
e.g. my servers don't need kde-* and games-*. Also taking into account |
| 28 |
that we use portage tree on embedded devices where again both size and |
| 29 |
speed really matters it looks like the answer on your question is |
| 30 |
"permanently". |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Peter. |
Archives