1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Eray Aslan wrote: |
4 |
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:26:01AM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
5 |
> > TL;DR: As of May 17, @gentoo.org will drop incoming spammy mail instead of |
6 |
> > delivering it. Speak now or hold your peace. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Believe me I understand your pain. Been there done that. However, |
9 |
> dropping mail is never a good idea. You are mucking with the |
10 |
> dependebility of the email. I would never be able to trust my gentoo |
11 |
> mail if you start dropping spammy mails. There will always be false |
12 |
> positives. I suggest: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> - Stop forwarding mail. Have devs pop their mails to whatever account |
15 |
> they like. I believe gmail -biggest complainer?- provides this |
16 |
> option. |
17 |
|
18 |
Big ol' bag of Nope for me. Using POP/IMAP to get mails from |
19 |
Gentoo servers to where I actually handle mail is a pain in the |
20 |
rear end. I already let procmail on woodpecker drop all Mails |
21 |
with a spam score of >=3. I still get shitloads of spam mail that |
22 |
makes it through. Hence, I'm currently training my own |
23 |
SpamAssassin for that bit. |
24 |
|
25 |
That said, I haven't had a false positive from SA in... years? |
26 |
Maybe even a decade. |
27 |
|
28 |
> - If the above option is not OK for whatever reason, at least let us |
29 |
> opt-out of the proposed policy of dropping mails provided we do not |
30 |
> forward our emails. |
31 |
|
32 |
I'd be fine with that. |
33 |
|
34 |
Regards, |
35 |
Tobias |
36 |
-- |
37 |
printk (KERN_INFO "NM256: Congratulations. You're not running Eunice.\n"); |
38 |
linux-2.6.19/sound/oss/nm256_audio.c |