| 1 |
i might point out that there is no debug use flag atm. |
| 2 |
i'm not saying there shouldn't be one, just saying |
| 3 |
one doesn't currently exist so i dont code for it. |
| 4 |
as soon as one gets put into use.desc i'll rewrite ebuilds |
| 5 |
-mike |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 8 |
From: "Jon Nelson" <jnelson@×××××××.net> |
| 9 |
To: "mike" <vapier@×××××××.com> |
| 10 |
Cc: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
| 11 |
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 22:22 |
| 12 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] --disable-debug, my friend...--disable-debug |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:23:09 -0400 |
| 16 |
> "mike" <vapier@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> > anytime you come across something that doesnt disable debug |
| 19 |
> > and in fact has the option feel free to post something to the |
| 20 |
> > list and bugs.gentoo.org ... i usually try to sed out -g and such |
| 21 |
> > from Makefiles when making ebuild's |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> However, that is inappropriate. That is what the debug use flag is for. |
| 24 |
> I personally feel that the default should be to build with debug symbols |
| 25 |
> on (but not profiling), but I also believe that for Gentoo (performance |
| 26 |
> oriented), the best default would be for the 'debug' use flag to be |
| 27 |
> turned off. In fact, I consider it a bug if an ebuild does *not* allow |
| 28 |
> for a debug-enabled build to be built. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Jon Nelson <jnelson@×××××××.net> |
| 35 |
> C and Python Code Gardener |
| 36 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 37 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 39 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 40 |
> |
Archives