Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, jannikglueckert@×××××.com | ||
| Cc: | Sam James <sam@g.o>, toolchain@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:02:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJ0EP42odb+F3A_X_HwVU=i04G7pafDq2w_rxaNLctirjp4YiQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag by "Jannik Glückert" |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:55 AM Jannik Glückert |
| 2 | <jannik.glueckert@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > This is not for stripping flags, it's for detecting a flag and e.g. |
| 5 | > changing the configure invocation accordingly. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > E.g. libreoffice has |
| 8 | > is-flagq "-flto*" && myeconfargs+=( --enable-lto ) |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Ah, that makes more sense. Thanks for explaining. |