1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 01/19/2013 12:05 PM, Duncan wrote: |
5 |
> Ben de Groot posted on Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:47:58 +0800 as excerpted: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> On 19 January 2013 18:26, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> |
9 |
>>> wrote: |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> People who do have printers can always enable [USE=cups] themselves. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>> Unless we plan on adding yet another profile for "normal" users I think |
14 |
>>> this is really pushing it. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>>> Yes, I'm sure some people don't own printers. However, that figure has |
17 |
>>> to be fairly low. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> I'm not so sure about that. The majority of my friends and colleagues |
20 |
>> don't own a printer. When we do need to print something, it would be for |
21 |
>> work, so we have it printed at work. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I recently heard someone /else/ recommend no printer, pointing out that |
24 |
> it was an additional expense without a lot of practical benefit for many, |
25 |
> since ink is expensive, the cheap printers are fiddly and often break, |
26 |
> and if you /really/ want something printed, it's easy enough to load it |
27 |
> on a thumb-drive and take it to kinkos or the library (or as Ben |
28 |
> suggests, work). |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I had come to that conclusion for myself some time ago and haven't had a |
31 |
> printer in years... I won't do inkjet and I always seem to have something |
32 |
> better to do with the money that'd buy a decent laser. But it was still |
33 |
> rather surprising to me, as like Rich, I'm from the generation where it |
34 |
> was just assumed that if you had a computer, you had, and needed, a |
35 |
> printer. So to hear (it was a meatspace conversation, with "average |
36 |
> folks", not geeks) someone ELSE say "take it to kinko's if you want to |
37 |
> print something" was /indeed/ quite surprising/enlightening. |
38 |
|
39 |
Removing cups from the default profile and putting it in the desktop |
40 |
profile makes sense. I don't print from everything, but I often print |
41 |
from things using the desktop profile. If a user really doesn't want |
42 |
cups they can always adjust their make.conf. Let's not bikeshed on this |
43 |
forever, we are only setting a sane default not removing the user's choice. |
44 |
|
45 |
Honestly it can be as simple as "cups is default now and removing that |
46 |
will break a lot of desktop users". So again, I vote for moving it to |
47 |
the desktop profile, but not for removing it altogether as that would |
48 |
break a lot of users. |
49 |
|
50 |
- -Zero |
51 |
|
52 |
> |
53 |
> So yes, I suppose it really is a generational/cultural thing. "The |
54 |
> tablet generation" and "the smartphone generation" are rather more likely |
55 |
> to find the idea of simply assuming that everyone with a computer/tablet/ |
56 |
> smartphone also has a bulky/balky printer... rather quaint. |
57 |
> |
58 |
|
59 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
60 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
61 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
62 |
|
63 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ+tX4AAoJEKXdFCfdEflKTFYP/AtPX4K6KKNlt1vaNUBSdDAr |
64 |
bsINnACEGJC5WljLX9FNgiVBH3yyTPiMJJoCZf494Rl4q1QhUypSg7twdkF9DVS5 |
65 |
1wYpCLeixQoe2LAjRApu5myCPDLMnSTdZIQy0tjsAsU2bO3HcJ++NJj633WMbjSY |
66 |
y54zaQeSTXXxOA+0XFXDEoF2H+icZuTBGsjZgpRlPMWcMglOmh1n9YLgeFT4Bmoz |
67 |
i+GgEB5TtvP9j+UNuuASPwiX3vJRSvaPbShiFGXMeGwiQPiKpam/ZH29EZst02Bv |
68 |
T8nDhWN4qsemCbWVc8ocgU2iA9andeYNkHsU4kB4MnEJUMZw9QwCcIEy6GYa6znv |
69 |
Y7ZBF1lr2Y4cZLXV8NCUChiyEIxLK/6F4kwFq3SnGOh1EEu7tZlWzE3pOjsQigQq |
70 |
kyadls0mlC0IA9mugnTrIJF7KRxzC2DTQhspPypEJc3p4i44/AKA3bHTzTviNwj7 |
71 |
NUIFMBp4zS5csCSVkAwWvCpmX1iX/5V0Xv0w9TKT99Vca2Zn54uB/scLLXOcqiNe |
72 |
jP5FknoDAhBy1iepM3H/5x6V+5YVnhB8wTGCRmXWfmVapQAu7/rQU66nYt0KumEM |
73 |
rR1dns7Qb4cW7VEPJ7E6MabFup6gk994Bd82WA78Sx0CFjfDMFah10l9dP2cbRi3 |
74 |
NCGKbT9JpnAOIsmOoLI1 |
75 |
=OBjr |
76 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |