| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Not sure if slot deps themselves could even replace version ranges |
| 6 |
>> hacks without also solving bug 4315 (native version ranges) in all |
| 7 |
>> cases. IMHO it should be possible at least to specify slot+usual |
| 8 |
>> version limit, to make it worth EAPI bump. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Please have a look at the slot dep format proposal. AFAIK none of the |
| 11 |
> P{aludis,kgcore,ortage} devs disagreed on that. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Sorry, I thought it was only about what's already implemented in portage |
| 14 |
and that's AFAIK only =cat/package:slot . Fine then. |
| 15 |
- -- |
| 16 |
Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
| 17 |
Gentoo/Java |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iD8DBQFGFX9QtbrAj05h3oQRAsPnAJ45IEwpsKQywZstG/hNgeRZVhoc6wCfcn3n |
| 23 |
YG1bvuQg9z0BzLiTqFEtQKE= |
| 24 |
=gEao |
| 25 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives