Archives
Archives
| From: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New categories: mate-base and mate-extra | ||
| Date: | Sat, 22 Feb 2014 23:05:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201402230007.50061.dilfridge@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New categories: mate-base and mate-extra by Tom Wijsman |
||
| 1 | Am Samstag, 22. Februar 2014, 19:02:54 schrieb Tom Wijsman: |
| 2 | > On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 +0000 (UTC) |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > (Or do we want a consistent 'mate-base' / 'mate-extra' approach?) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | If there is a clear distinction between a core set of packages and extra stuff |
| 8 | (as in e.g. kde4), the combination mate-base / mate-extra would probably be |
| 9 | best. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Andreas K. Huettel |
| 13 | Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) |
| 14 | dilfridge@g.o |
| 15 | http://www.akhuettel.de/ |