| 1 |
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> >> That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single |
| 7 |
> >> category for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the |
| 8 |
> >> name. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > TL;DR: Yes, we could try that; but what would be a consistent name? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> mate-desktop ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
While still inconsistent with what already exists, that indeed sounds |
| 15 |
sane towards the user, +1; does someone object 'mate-desktop'? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> (The mate-base and mate-extra split seems more consistent with the |
| 18 |
> rest of the tree to me, and around a dozen packages each seems fine, |
| 19 |
> but if it's to be a single category, mate-desktop seems reasonable. |
| 20 |
> Or desktop- mate, or mate-dt...) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
(Or do we want a consistent 'mate-base' / 'mate-extra' approach?) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
With kind regards, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 31 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 32 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives