| 1 |
* Kent Fredric schrieb am 16.06.16 um 16:05 Uhr: |
| 2 |
> On 17 June 2016 at 01:52, Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > because |
| 4 |
> > sometimes, issues can get reported that are really obscure and, for example, |
| 5 |
> > tied to a particular hardware configuration, thus cannot be easily and |
| 6 |
> > independently confirmed |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Isn't that why "RESOLVED: Need Info" exists? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For me "RESOLVED" and "Need Info" does not belong together, so I find |
| 12 |
this state superfluous... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
How about "ON HOLD: Need Info" instead? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
0xCA3E7BF67F979BE5 - F7FB 78F7 7CC3 79F6 DF07 |
| 19 |
6E9E CA3E 7BF6 7F97 9BE5 |
Archives