| 1 |
3.1.2006, 12:47:27, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> So you have now taken what was described as an automatic solution to |
| 5 |
> reduce size into a manual process, reducing usability of the ChangeLog |
| 6 |
> and increasing workload for every ebuild developer. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> I'm sorry, but I still think the idea of simply RSYNC_EXCLUDEing the |
| 9 |
> ChangeLog by default would be a much better solution. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+1; I frequently find even pretty old changelog entries useful (even the |
| 12 |
'stable on foo' ones are useful, if you need to find out who keyworded the |
| 13 |
thing stable despite the fact that it's severely broken). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
As for RSYNC_EXCLUDE by default, that's not something that should be |
| 16 |
considered until GLEP 42 or an equivalent solution gets implemented. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Jakub Moc |
| 23 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 24 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 25 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives