| 1 |
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 10:23 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> Would it be too horrible to change to a 6-month release? Then we could |
| 3 |
> coincide the information between us both and not have 2 separate |
| 4 |
> processes for doing essentially the same thing. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I agree with this and have suggested it in the past. I think six months |
| 7 |
gives us enough time to package a release, and allows enough time for |
| 8 |
significant changes to show up to make releases worthwhlie/newsworthy. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
A few cows moo'd that they didn't want time-based releases, though. For |
| 11 |
whatever reasons I can't fathom. It makes our release process more |
| 12 |
predictable for everyone, including developers. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Cheers, |
| 15 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
| 16 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives