| 1 |
Sergey Popov posted on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:22:34 +0400 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> 22.01.2013 08:23, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I guess this change is ok, given that I can opt-out fairly easily. |
| 5 |
>> Zac's workaround for binary packages makes me feel better too. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I am curious, can not this check be added to eclass? Or eclass does not |
| 8 |
> know about type of merged package? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
AFAIK, binpkgs are a PM-specific feature that isn't managed by PMS. As |
| 11 |
such, eclasses and ebuilds officially must remain binpkg agnostic, |
| 12 |
leaving all such handling to the PMs themselves. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 16 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 17 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives