Archives
Archives
| From: | Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default | ||
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2013 06:23:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 50FE302A.1040600@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | 22.01.2013 08:23, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 | > I guess this change is ok, given that I can opt-out fairly easily. Zac's |
| 3 | > workaround for binary packages makes me feel better too. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I am curious, can not this check be added to eclass? Or eclass does not |
| 6 | know about type of merged package? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 10 | Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 11 | Desktop-effects project lead |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |