Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Josh Ockert <torstenvl@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Apache build
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 13:41:51
Message-Id: 126eac4804060506413553f921@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Apache build by Grant Goodyear
1 On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:37:12 -0400, Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > > "We intend GLEPs to be the primary mechanisms for proposing
4 > > significant new features, for collecting community input on an issue,
5 > > and for documenting the design decisions that have gone into Gentoo
6 > > Linux."
7 >
8 > I believe that Mike was referring to the webapp GLEP, in particular.
9 > It's quite possible that one of the reasons that the default config
10 > is different is because Gentoo now has exceptional support for
11 > virtualizing web applications reasonably painlessly.
12 >
13 > In any event, you're more likely to get a real answer if you file
14 > a bug at bugs.gentoo.org with your suggested changes and rationale.
15 >
16 > -g2boojum-
17 > --
18 > Grant Goodyear
19 > Gentoo Developer
20 > g2boojum@g.o
21 > http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
22 > GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
23
24 >From what I've seen, that's not very likely.
25 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2487
26
27 Gentoo itself seems like a cool idea but you guys have some pretty
28 fucked up problems, both in the system itself and (in reference to a
29 very small number of specific individuals), personally.
30
31 I think I'll go back to FreeBSD.
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Apache build Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>