1 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
>> My point is that that's a nasty QA bug that's relying upon input from |
4 |
>> Stuart to be fixed. Whilst that one's still alive, I'm not going to go |
5 |
>> around filing more similar "breaks non-interactively" bugs because the |
6 |
>> discussion will just get repeated over and over. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Huh? I just read through the bug, and it actually appears to be |
9 |
> resolved pending Chris' testing w/ the needed USE flags added to the |
10 |
> various profiles. I'll admit that the fix is inelegant, but I'm missing |
11 |
> where it's waiting upon Stuart for additional info. Am I missing something? |
12 |
|
13 |
Yes, you are missing that the bug really isn't fixed. There are still |
14 |
USE combinations which would be otherwise perfectly valid, but which |
15 |
cause php to fail to emerge, thus reaking non-interactivity and forcing |
16 |
people to (ab)use /etc/portage/package.use to get things working properly. |
17 |
|
18 |
-Steve |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |