1 |
27.2.2006, 22:18:05, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Grant Goodyear wrote: |
4 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
>>> My point is that that's a nasty QA bug that's relying upon input from |
6 |
>>> Stuart to be fixed. Whilst that one's still alive, I'm not going to go |
7 |
>>> around filing more similar "breaks non-interactively" bugs because the |
8 |
>>> discussion will just get repeated over and over. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Huh? I just read through the bug, and it actually appears to be |
11 |
>> resolved pending Chris' testing w/ the needed USE flags added to the |
12 |
>> various profiles. I'll admit that the fix is inelegant, but I'm missing |
13 |
>> where it's waiting upon Stuart for additional info. Am I missing something? |
14 |
|
15 |
> There are still USE combinations which would be otherwise perfectly valid, |
16 |
> but which cause php to fail to emerge, thus reaking non-interactivity and |
17 |
> forcing people to (ab)use /etc/portage/package.use to get things working |
18 |
> properly. |
19 |
|
20 |
Yeah, and there will be, since chosing between stuff like mysql or recode on |
21 |
behalf of the user is plain stupid and produces unexpected outcome, since |
22 |
portage can't handle build_with_use this way, since portage can't handle use |
23 |
flags conflict at emerge --pretend/--ask time, and last but not least since |
24 |
there's no such policy that would mandate such changes. |
25 |
|
26 |
However, I'm still one ear wrt the original topic, which was "all the ways |
27 |
in which webapp-config is broken". |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Best regards, |
32 |
|
33 |
Jakub Moc |
34 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
35 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
36 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
37 |
|
38 |
... still no signature ;) |