1 |
* Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
2 |
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
3 |
> > Open council spot |
4 |
> > ----------------- |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > leio is next on the list. He's willing to join the council. A few of us |
7 |
> > already voted to confirm him on-list, and we're waiting on the others. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Goal: Vote to confirm him, if necessary. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> |
12 |
> There already were enough votes (4/6 I think) to confirm him. |
13 |
|
14 |
GLEP 39 doesn't specify what happens when a member leaves. It does only |
15 |
talk about slackers. |
16 |
|
17 |
A former council decided to offer any open position to the next in line |
18 |
and "if they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new |
19 |
person, they get the position". |
20 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070208-summary.txt> |
21 |
|
22 |
4/6 is not "unanimously". |
23 |
|
24 |
But... |
25 |
|
26 |
This all was before "_reopen_nominations" was introduced. With |
27 |
"_reopen_nominations" I don't see why the council needs to vote at all. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
There might be a problem if another member leaves as the next two are |
31 |
ranked equally. |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks |