| 1 |
Rich Freeman: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Rich, if I may have a suggestion, it would be that instead of meddling |
| 4 |
>> with projects that have been doing their best with what they have for |
| 5 |
>> years, and which need praise rather than hindrance, you instead start |
| 6 |
>> a project to get people to think positively and accept criticism. The |
| 7 |
>> amount of energy that was spent in this thread and many others in pure |
| 8 |
>> loss could have gone a long way. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The only thing that I've offered to do is to help people join the |
| 11 |
> games team, which is supposed to be an open team anyway. That is |
| 12 |
> about the extent of the "meddling" that I've proposed. I've yet to |
| 13 |
> hear anybody on the games team comment that more help would not be |
| 14 |
> welcome. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> That said, I've also yet to hear from anybody actually interested in |
| 17 |
> joining the games team. So, that idea may not end up going anywhere |
| 18 |
> anyway. The premise has been that there are people interested in |
| 19 |
> working on games but they've been prevented from doing so, and working |
| 20 |
> to help improve the games team from within is better than imposing |
| 21 |
> direction from above. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> If indeed nobody actually wants to join the games team, then the next |
| 24 |
> question is whether to leave things alone, or to find another |
| 25 |
> solution. Either way I'd like to hear more from anybody who actually |
| 26 |
> wants to maintain games packages but feels they have been unable to do |
| 27 |
> so. Simply changing policies won't make actual work happen. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Rich |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I appreciate your effort, but what can you do about it? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
a) I'm not sure if I want to be in a team where vapier is lead. I have a |
| 35 |
lot of respect for his technical skills/knowledge, but I don't have any |
| 36 |
hopes for him to understand what a project lead is supposed to do |
| 37 |
(like... answer). |
| 38 |
b) I don't want the games team to be disbanded like QA, it will probably |
| 39 |
make the situation worse. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
I will continue to work with Mr_Bones_, but if any1 says there is no |
| 42 |
problem with the games project, then he either doesn't know anything |
| 43 |
about the situation or he doesn't want to know. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Again, you seem to be the only council member who cares to mediate here. |
| 46 |
That is pretty frustrating. |
Archives