| 1 |
Isn't the whole anongit.gentoo.org concept designed to allow anonymous, |
| 2 |
read-only git to scale indefinitely in the future? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Are there any plans in the works on how to utilize this domain name? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:04:38 +0100 |
| 9 |
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > Matt Turner schrieb: |
| 12 |
> > > The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively |
| 13 |
> > > improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per |
| 14 |
> > > month: https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > I'd like to point out that some stuff that has previously been done |
| 17 |
> > in a single commit is now several commits (e.g. bump + removal of old |
| 18 |
> > version). How much of the rise in commit activity is attributable to |
| 19 |
> > actual development increase is not clear to me. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Also, last I checked, openhub couldn't even process our CVS tree. |
| 23 |
> Meaning the only stats it had were some random overlays hosted on git. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
Archives