1 |
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 07:38:12 +0530 |
4 |
> "Nirbheek Chauhan" <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> 1) You say the benefits haven't been pointed out, while several posts |
6 |
>> have already done so. You seem to be the only one pretending to be |
7 |
>> unaware of them. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> No no no. The benefits described would be obtained by fixing libtool. |
10 |
> What you get from as-needed is a half-arsed sometimes-working subset of |
11 |
> those benefits. as-needed is not the fix for the libtool problems. |
12 |
|
13 |
Once again, you do not support your argument with anything but your |
14 |
own word. Don't make me choke on the salt please :) |
15 |
|
16 |
> |
17 |
>> 2) The "expense of breaking things" is completely unqualified in your |
18 |
>> post. Here's some context: "expense" is minimal since the problem is |
19 |
>> easily fixable, and "breaking things" is the list of bugs on the |
20 |
>> tracker bug -- 19 with most of them already having patches that just |
21 |
>> need to be committed |
22 |
> |
23 |
> And all of which are utterly pointless. |
24 |
|
25 |
Ah, that's assuming your arguments are right, and your arguments |
26 |
aren't supported, so I'll take some more salt with this one. |
27 |
|
28 |
> |
29 |
>> 3) You say fixing libtool is the correct solution but you don't say |
30 |
>> why or explain how. You don't give any information at all, and due to |
31 |
>> the non-existant evidence, I am going to take the statement with a |
32 |
>> fist of salt. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> I'm assuming everyone contributing to this thread knows exactly what the |
35 |
> libtool problems are... But from the looks of things, plenty of people |
36 |
> are quite happy to jump in and yell when they don't have the slightest |
37 |
> clue what the root problem is, what as-needed changes, what as-needed |
38 |
> breaks or how as-needed is unrelated to the problem. |
39 |
|
40 |
Once again, rhetoric and insults without logic or reason. We all know |
41 |
you know that you need facts to convince people, but you're not |
42 |
providing any facts. One can only conclude that your purpose is not to |
43 |
convince. I honestly am baffled what purpose you have in mind. |
44 |
|
45 |
> And unfortunately, |
46 |
> it looks like those people are the ones that're going to be making the |
47 |
> decisions. |
48 |
|
49 |
Excellent, then you are free to point and laugh when we trip and fall. |
50 |
In the meantime, if you truly think everyone is making the wrong |
51 |
decision, talk with some facts and/or statistics. |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |