| 1 |
Hi again everyone, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Could you also include, with your data, the packages that you maintain |
| 4 |
(I forgot to request that info). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Thanks. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Best regards, |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Andrey Falko |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
---------- Original message ---------- |
| 13 |
From: Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@×××××.com> |
| 14 |
Date: Nov 14, 2006 8:50 PM |
| 15 |
Subject: Data Collection and Survey |
| 16 |
To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Hi everyone, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I am attempting to gather data for my Simulation course at Columbia |
| 22 |
University. The data will be used for my Simulation project where my |
| 23 |
aim is to estimate the work load of developers related to the |
| 24 |
maintenance of the portage tree. The Simulation will generate fake |
| 25 |
package releases and bug reports in simulation time, and compute the |
| 26 |
number of hours each developer spends working as well as other |
| 27 |
interesting information. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
There are two pieces of data that I am attempting to gather: |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
1) emerge.logs from all developers maintaining packages (to determine |
| 32 |
the respective compile times of all maintained packages in portage |
| 33 |
tree), preferably multiple ones from each (to gauge the effect of |
| 34 |
multiple workstations). |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
2) A rough estimate from all developers maintaining packages of how |
| 37 |
many times they have to recompile (i.e. test their ebuilds) a package |
| 38 |
before committing a new ebuild. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
The more data I can collect, the more accurate the Simulation will be. |
| 41 |
Thank you all in advance for your cooperation. And thank you for |
| 42 |
spending the time making a great distribution. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Best regards, |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Andrey Falko |
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives