| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:17 +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Ostrow wrote: |
| 3 |
> > That would work for fetch restricted packages, not nomirrored ones. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > --Dan |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> /me nods. That's what we'll have to do. Unfortunately, it leaves users |
| 8 |
> with a worse experience than before, but until I can find a way to reach |
| 9 |
> the QA team and help them see my pov as the package maintainer, what |
| 10 |
> else can I do? :( |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Don't know why this didn't occur to me before but this is exactly what |
| 13 |
the Java team does for IBM's jdk/jre. IBM releases all micro releases |
| 14 |
under a tarball of the same name so end users already have to rename it |
| 15 |
before placing it in ${DISTDIR}. The only difference there is IBM's |
| 16 |
files were already fetch restricted. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
In any event, even though I'm not part of the QA team, thanks for |
| 19 |
accepting an alternate solution. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
--Dan |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives