| 1 |
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:17:06 -0600 |
| 2 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 6 |
> > | What if instead of having proj/en we did herd/en on www? Of |
| 7 |
> > course, that | doesn't help the whole "GuideXML is hard" bit. I |
| 8 |
> > like the idea of using | RST, but it doesn't seem very scalable at |
| 9 |
> > this time. Maybe, instead of | that, we created some kind of |
| 10 |
> > development site for herds (maybe | herds.g.o). Could be a place |
| 11 |
> > where herds put up status updates, specific | docs, draft docs, |
| 12 |
> > etc. Once things get established on that site, docs | could get |
| 13 |
> > moved to GDP if it were logical to do. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Really every herd should be either part of a project or in the |
| 16 |
> > process of creating a new one for themselves by now. There's no |
| 17 |
> > excuse, since the block on creating new projects disappeared. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I understand the block was lifted for projects, but that doesn't mean |
| 20 |
> herds should all should fit underneath proj/. I think we should open |
| 21 |
> up a similar space just for herds. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
How about proj/en/misc/<herd> ? I'd rather not add another top-level |
| 24 |
tier to the website, also makes things IMO more consistent (user doesn't |
| 25 |
have to care if herd is part of a project or not). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Marius |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 33 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives