| 1 |
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 13:22:45 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:47:14 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Because I'd expect a stage3 to be posix compliant |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I agree. It's time to replace nano with Vim. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Vim is not fully POSIX compliant; you may find it claim "mostly" in its |
| 11 |
documentation, but that's where it stays at and thus doesn't suffice... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
While we're at it, we must make everyone use a POSIX IDE with a ribbon! |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Jokes aside, this sub discussion is pointless; if we want results, a |
| 16 |
moderated mailing list as suggested in a reply won't cut it! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What is really needed here is a vote by the Council on whether to add bc |
| 19 |
back to the stage3. If the people do insist, another vote regarding |
| 20 |
adding or changing an editor to stage3 could be done as well. |
Archives