| 1 |
28.2.2006, 19:39:15, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> <snip> ewarn "This ebuild overrides the default SLOT behaviour for |
| 4 |
>> webapps" ewarn "If this package installs files into the htdocs dir, this |
| 5 |
>> is" ewarn "probably a bug in the ebuild." </snip> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Sigh... what kind of QA issue is that? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> which part dont you understand ? the user sets a variable and then is told |
| 10 |
> that the package probably contains a bug ... seems pretty confusing to me |
| 11 |
> -mike |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
rl03 already replied to that. I don't see any QA issues there, and if |
| 14 |
someone from QA team does, then he probably has too much time to ponder over |
| 15 |
the tree and invent issues where they don't exist. I don't see any point |
| 16 |
"fixing" this, at least until FEATURES="mindreader" is implemented. Portage |
| 17 |
QA notices may be equally confusing to the users, with this kind of logic, |
| 18 |
yet they stay there - and number of people complaining about USE_EXPAND |
| 19 |
notices is much higher than the number of people who complained about |
| 20 |
confusing ewarn from webapps slot (exactly zero is far as I could find). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Once again, don't invent problems, please. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
jakub |
Archives