1 |
Hmmm, Just saw this was suggestion no. 2 in Bugzilla....Seems I have to |
2 |
spend EVEN MORE time overthere ;-D ! |
3 |
|
4 |
Never Mind ! |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
Rigo |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
Op zo 18-08-2002, om 11:40 schreef Rigo: |
11 |
> Op zo 18-08-2002, om 08:57 schreef Jonathan Kelly: |
12 |
> > On 18 Aug 2002 16:31:21 +1000 |
13 |
> > Troy Dack <troy@××××××.com> wrote: |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > > On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 14:04, Jonathan Kelly wrote: |
16 |
> > > > I beg to differ ... I did this with media-gfx/povray and after every |
17 |
> > > > "emerge sync" I get .... |
18 |
> > > > # emerge -pu povray |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > My apologies, I thought that the local ebuilds were NOT checked against |
21 |
> > > packages.mask. |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > > I've just tried the same thing as you, with the same results. |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > It would make sense (to me anyway) if the local ebuilds in |
26 |
> > > $PORTDIR_OVERLAY were *NOT* checked against packages.mask, that way us |
27 |
> > > end users could assist the developers by simply dropping masked ebuilds |
28 |
> > > into our local tree and then testing them. Sure it means that there is |
29 |
> > > duplication and some extra hard drive space taken up, but ebuilds aren't |
30 |
> > > that big. Also for those wishing to test ebuilds it would be a |
31 |
> > > conscious decision to place a masked ebuild in your local tree. |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > I think that is a logical and great idea. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Wouldn't it also be nice if settings in |
36 |
> $PORTDIR_OVERLAY/profiles/package.mask overrule settings in |
37 |
> $PORTDIR/profiles/package.mask ? This way directories could stay in |
38 |
> $PORTDIR and you don't have to keep worrying about changin' package.mask |
39 |
> time & time again. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Ex: |
42 |
> |
43 |
> lappy # diff /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask |
44 |
> /root/package.mask.2|grep povray |
45 |
> |
46 |
> < #=media-gfx/povray-3.50a |
47 |
> > =media-gfx/povray-3.50a |
48 |
> |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Just a thought, |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Rigo |
53 |
> |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> > Cheers. |
56 |
> > Jonathan Kelly. |
57 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
58 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
59 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
60 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
61 |
> |
62 |
> |
63 |
> _______________________________________________ |
64 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
65 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
66 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |