| 1 |
On Friday 07 July 2006 02:46, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> this sort of closed mindedness isnt really encouraging ... |
| 3 |
Err I actually thought if icc in the first place and tried to inform myself. |
| 4 |
I'm not the kind of person (and you should know) who likes breaking |
| 5 |
unsupported stuff. I think it's reasonable to find a solution that works with |
| 6 |
ICC, and actually Harald already gave one later in the thread. |
| 7 |
It's just a matter of fact that we don't have anybody right now to follow what |
| 8 |
might and might not break this or that unsupported compiler. As soon as there |
| 9 |
is a single person ready to at least answer to questions about it, the |
| 10 |
situation changes. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm just saying that I wouldn't discard entirely a solution just because some |
| 13 |
unsupported software _might_ not work (note the conditional). I wouldn't |
| 14 |
discard a solution just because it _might_ not work on GNU/kFreeBSD; I would |
| 15 |
discard it if I _know for sure_ that it does not work on GNU/kFreeBSD (in |
| 16 |
which case, knowing it doesn't work, I would look for a working solution). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
| 20 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives