| 1 |
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:22:04 -0500 |
| 2 |
Joshua Pollak <pardsbane@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Something along the lines of Bugzilla/SF's features/phpBugTracker, etc, |
| 5 |
> should be fine, right? I could set it up on my own server, or I can set |
| 6 |
> it up somewhere else. If the project is willing to accept the work, once |
| 7 |
> done, I'll get started right away. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
See if you can't get in contact with chadh on how to set it up on |
| 10 |
cvs.gentoo.org (which perhaps should get a new alias: bugs.gentoo.org ?). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
We should have at least two modes for the bugtracker: end-user and |
| 13 |
developer. The full-blown bugzilla interface is a bit intimidating for |
| 14 |
first-time end-users, so they should by default get an easy-to-use |
| 15 |
interface. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The regular developers should get the full-blown interface, I guess. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The main thing about the bugtracker is that we should _USE_ it. So we'll |
| 20 |
just have to keep tweaking it until everybody uses it for adding ebuilds, |
| 21 |
bug reports, wishes, etc. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
In fact, we should perhaps rename it from "bugtracker" to "issuetracker", |
| 24 |
since we want to have it handle more than just bugs: we want all new |
| 25 |
ebuilds to be submitted through it, so that it can help us not forget half |
| 26 |
of the ebuilds that get submitted. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Karl T |
Archives