| 1 |
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 02:46:52 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> That said, while I didn't see any objections, what surprised me was the |
| 6 |
> speed at which it happened. The RFC was posted early afternoon (my time) |
| 7 |
> on a Friday. The commit was early evening on a Sunday. Not even an |
| 8 |
> entire weekend. It seems to me that in the context of gentoo-dev, if one |
| 9 |
> is really interested in the comments he has supposedly requested, giving |
| 10 |
> a full week for comments is more traditional. There was no emergency |
| 11 |
> here, and honestly, given the speed, the /appearance/ is that it was an |
| 12 |
> effort to railroad it thru. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> That's said even tho I agree that full-clone should be the default and am |
| 15 |
> neutral on shallow-clone functionality (as long as it doesn't interfere |
| 16 |
> with my ability to set full-clone locally), so the changes themselves are |
| 17 |
> good by me. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+1 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
There wasn't enough time left for people to respond. There is |
| 23 |
Scale going on this weekend also, not that 70% of the gentoo devs were |
| 24 |
attending... Still, 1 week is not too long to wait. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |
Archives